Groups call for abolishing death penalty2011/10/10 23:00:42
Taipei, Oct. 10 (CNA) Amnesty International (AI) Taiwan and the Taiwan Alliance to End the Death Penalty on Monday, World Day Against the Death Penalty, reiterated their call for the government to abolish capital punishment in Taiwan and to align with international standards of human rights.
"We will remember today as the birthday of Chiang Kuo-ching, instead of Taiwan's National Day," said Lin Hsin-yi, executive director of the alliance at a film-showing event organized by the two groups to raise public awareness of the issue of death penalty.
Chiang, born on Oct. 10, 1975, was an Air Force serviceman who was wrongfully executed on a rape and murder conviction 14 years ago. He was acquitted in a posthumous retrial by a military court Sept. 13, 2011.
A Taiwanese air force private executed 14 years ago for the rape and murder of a five-year-old girl was innocent after all, a military court has ruled.
The court found there was no evidence linking the airman, Chiang Kuo-ching, to the crime.
The case has reignited debate in Taiwan over its use of the death penalty.
EETO calls for abolition of death penalty in Taiwan
Taipei, Aug. 31 (CNA) The European Economic and Trade Office (EETO) in Taipei on Wednesday repeated its call for the Taiwan government to abolish the death penalty.
Frederic Laplanche, who assumed the post of EETO chief on July 20, said Taiwan's efforts on the matter so far had fallen short of expectations after the European Union (EU) issued two statements earlier this year and in 2010 in condemnation of Taiwan's recent executions of death row prisoners.
"It's not enough at all," the French diplomat said a media briefing. "The Taiwan government should take the right path, which means it should to stop death penalty executions immediately."
本週三,一名佛羅里達南區地方法院的法官判決佛羅里達施行死刑的程序違憲。佛羅里達的死刑法 [Fla Stat Ann § 921.141 text] 規定,死刑案件中陪審團根據特定導致終身監禁或死刑的加重因素是否存在而提出「建議量刑」。這些加重因素包括犯罪行為是否為了錢財、特別兇殘或殘酷、是否為冷靜計算的預謀殺人。法院若不接受建議量刑,則自行調查是否有足夠的加重因素。94頁的判決中,Jose Martinez法官認定,佛羅里達施行死刑的方式違反憲法第六修正案(有權受公正陪審團審判),由於法官可能依據陪審團沒有考慮過之因素來決定,為了避免這樣的風險,所以是由陪審團,而不是由法官來認定。Jose Martinez法官引用Ring v. Arizona(判決全文,2002年最高法院認定亞利桑那的相似制度違憲)來支持判決。佛羅里達美國公民自由聯盟讚賞此判決: